4.8 Article

Comparison of the efficiency and mechanism of catalytic ozonation of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole by iron and manganese modified bauxite

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 171-181

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.003

关键词

Catalytic ozonation; Bauxite; Iron modification bauxite (IMB); Manganese modification bauxite (MMB); 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole

资金

  1. Research Funds for the Central Universities [HJ2010-5]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108030]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100014120001]
  4. China Post Doctoral Science Foundation [20100470216, 201104060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency and mechanism of catalytic ozonation of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) by metal oxide modified bauxite were studied. TCA was effectively degraded by catalytic ozonation in the presence of iron-or manganese-modified bauxite (IMB or MMB). The effect of water pH on catalytic ozonation indicated that surface property was the key factor that influenced the activity of catalyst. Analysis results of the isoelectric point (IEP) and zeta potential for catalyst further confirmed that a lower zeta potential for modified bauxite enhanced catalytic activity. Results of both catalytic ozone decomposition and radical scavengers experiments indicated that catalytic ozonation by IMB or MMB followed a hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot) reaction pathway. The main reaction pathway was proposed that adsorption of both ozone and TCA in the micropores and subsequent interaction (direct and indirect oxidation) between them that was confirmed by the analysis of the surface pore volume and surface hydroxyl groups, being followed by the diffusion of ozone and TCA on the mesoporous surface, in which surface hydroxyl groups covering mesoporous surface initialed ozone decomposition to generate (OH)-O-center dot, resulted in TCA degradation. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据