4.5 Article

Resistance to oxidative stress by chronic infusion of angiotensin II in mouse kidney is not mediated by the AT2 receptor

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 288, 期 6, 页码 F1191-F1200

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00322.2004

关键词

mice; renin-angiotensin system; heme oxygenase-1; free radicals; NADPH-oxidase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wild-type mice are resistant to ANG II-induced renal injury and hence form an attractive model to study renal defense against ANG II. The present study tested whether ANG II induces expression of antioxidative genes via the AT(2) receptor in renal cortex and thereby counteracts prooxidative forces. ANG II was infused in female C57BL/6J mice for 28 days and a subgroup received AT(2) receptor antagonist (PD-123,319) for the last 3 days. ANG II induced hypertension and aortic hypertrophy; proteinuria and renal injury were absent. Urinary nitric oxide metabolites (NOX) were decreased, and lipid peroxide (TBARS) excretion remained unchanged. Expression of NADPH oxidase components was decreased in renal cortex but induced in aorta. Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) was induced in both renal cortex and aorta. In contrast, ANG II suggestively increased AT(2) receptor expression in kidney but not in aorta. AT(2) receptor blockade enhanced hypertension in ANG II-infused mice, reversed ANG II effects on NOX excretion, but did not affect TBARS. Despite its prohypertensive effect, expression of prooxidative genes in the renal cortex decreased rather than increased after short-term AT(2) receptor blockade and renal HO-1 induction after ANG II was normalized. Thus chronic ANG II infusion in mice induces hypertension but not oxidative stress. In contrast to the response in aorta, gene expression of components of NADPH-oxidase was not enhanced in renal cortex. Although ANG II administration induced renal cortical AT(2) receptor expression, blockade of that receptor did not unveil the AT(2) receptor as intrarenal dampening factor of prooxidative forces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据