4.7 Article

Using a suppression subtractive library-based approach to identify tobacco genes regulated in response to short-term sulphur deficit

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 56, 期 416, 页码 1575-1590

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri152

关键词

starvation; stress signaling; sulphur metabolism; suppression subtractive hybridization; tobacco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring expression at the transcriptional level is an essential first step for the functional analysis of plant genes. Genes encoding proteins directly involved in sulphur metabolism constitute only a small fraction of all the genes affected by sulphur deficiency stress. Transcriptional responses to various periods of sulphur deprivation have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis thaliana; however, no corresponding data are available for Solanaceae sp. To address this problem, a subtractive library-based approach to search for tobacco genes regulated by a short-term sulphur starvation has been adopted. In this work, 38 genes were identified, of which 22 were regulated positively and 16 were regulated negatively. The transcript levels of the representative genes were monitored in four parts of the plants (mature and immature leaves, stems, and roots), which exhibited differential sulphur deficiency. Interestingly, some genes exhibit different regulation of expression in different parts of the plants. Database analysis allowed assignment of the potential function for many of the identified genes; however, the functions of a small number of genes strongly regulated by sulphur starvation remain unknown. The genes were grouped into nine functional categories, each including both up- and down-regulated genes. The possible links between the identified regulated genes and sulphur metabolism are considered, and compared where possible with expression patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana. Although no obvious regulatory genes were identified, the genes encoding proteins of unknown function remain as potential components of the regulatory processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据