4.3 Article

The contribution of nitric oxide and vasodilatory prostanoids to bradykinin-mediated vasodilation in Type 1 diabetes

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 697-702

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01493.x

关键词

bradykinin; endothelial function; nitric oxide; prostaglandins; Type 1 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims To investigate the effect of bradykinin on endothelial tone in normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients and specifically whether any changes are mediated through nitric oxide or prostaglandins. Methods Forearm blood flow was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography at baseline and after brachial artery infusions of incremental doses of bradykinin (50, 100 and 200 ng/min) in 15 patients with Type I diabetes and 13 non-diabetic controls. Forearm blood flow at baseline and following bradykinin was then re-examined after local infusion of L-NMMA, a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, and L-NMMA with indomethacin, a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor. Results Baseline blood flow in the diabetic and control groups were similar (4.46 +/- 1.11 vs. 3.41 +/- 1.23 ml/min/ 100 ml, respectively; P = 0.07). After infusion Of L-NMMA and L-NMMA with indomethacin, there was a similar reduction in blood flow responses to bradykinin in both groups. There was no significant difference between the diabetic patients and control subjects in the percentage reduction in forearm blood flow following L-NMMA (16.55 vs. 18.12%, respectively, P = 0.94) and L-NMMA with indomethacin (47.1 vs. 37.3%, respectively, P = 0.14). Conclusions This study demonstrates that bradykinin-stimulated vasodilation is mediated by both nitric oxide and prostaglandin release from the endothelium in patients with Type 1 diabetes and normoalbuminuria, and in healthy control subjects. We have also shown that the relative contributions of nitric oxide and prostaglandin to bradykinin-mediated vasodilation are similar in these diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据