4.5 Article

Novel method for in vivo hydroxyl radical measurement by microdialysis in fetal sheep brain in utero

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 2304-2310

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00617.2004

关键词

terephthalic acid; Fenton reaction; fetus; microdialysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroxyl radical (center dot OH) is a reactive oxygen species produced during severe hypoxia, asphyxia, or ischemia that can cause cell death resulting in brain damage. Generation of center dot OH may occur in the fetal brain during asphyxia in utero. The very short half-life of center dot OH requires use of trapping agents such as salicylic acid or phenylalanine for detection, but their hydroxylated derivatives are either unstable, produced endogenously, or difficult to measure in the small volume of microdialysis samples. In the present study, we used terephthalic acid ( TA), hydroxylation of which yields a stable and highly fluorometric isomer ( excitation, 326 nm; emission, 432 nm). In vitro studies using center dot OH generated by the Fenton reaction showed that hydroxylated TA formed quickly ( < 10 s), was resistant to bleaching ( < 5% change in fluorescence), and permitted detection of < 0.5 pmol center dot OH. In vivo studies were performed in fetal sheep using microdialysis probes implanted into the parasagittal cortex. The probe was perfused at 2 mu l/min with artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing 5 mM TA, and samples were collected every 30 min. Fluorescence measured in 10 mu l of dialysate was significantly greater than in the efflux from probes perfused without TA. High-performance liquid chromotography analysis showed that the fluorescence in dialysis samples was entirely due to hydroxylation of TA. Thus this study shows that it is possible to use TA as a trapping agent for detecting low concentrations of center dot OH both in vitro and in vivo and that low concentrations of center dot OH are present in fetal brain tissue and fluctuate with time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据