4.8 Article

Production of adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory protein, in mesenteric adipose tissue in Crohn's disease

期刊

GUT
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 789-796

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2004.046516

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: A characteristic feature of Crohn's disease ( CD) is mesenteric adipose tissue hypertrophy. Mesenteric adipocytes or specific proteins secreted by them may play a role in the pathogenesis of CD. We recently identified adiponectin as an adipocyte specific protein with anti-inflammatory properties. Here we report on expression of adiponectin in mesenteric adipose tissue of CD patients. Methods and results: Mesenteric adipose tissue specimens were obtained from patients with CD ( n = 22), ulcerative colitis ( UC) ( n = 8) and, for controls, colon carcinoma patients ( n = 28) who underwent intestinal resection. Adiponectin concentrations were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and adiponectin mRNA levels were determined by real time quantitative reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction. Tissue concentrations and release of adiponectin were significantly increased in hypertrophied mesenteric adipose tissue of CD patients compared with normal mesenteric adipose tissue of CD patients ( p = 0.002, p = 0.040, respectively), UC patients ( p = 0.002, p = 0.003), and controls ( p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Adiponectin mRNA levels were significantly higher in hypertrophied mesenteric adipose tissue of CD patients than in paired normal mesenteric adipose tissue from the same subjects ( p = 0.024). Adiponectin concentrations in hypertrophied mesenteric adipose tissue of CD patients with an internal fistula were significantly lower than those of CD patients without an internal fistula ( p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our results suggest that adipocytes in hypertrophied mesenteric adipose tissue produce and secrete significant amounts of adiponectin, which could be involved in the regulation of intestinal inflammation associated with CD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据