4.5 Article

Homeobox B3, FoxA1 and FoxA2 interactions in epithelial lung cell differentiation of the multipotent M3E3/C3 cell line

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 555-566

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2004.12.026

关键词

HoxB3; FoxA2; CCSP; epithelial cell; surfactant; bronchiole; HOM/C; Nkx2.1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HOM/C homcobox (Hox) and forkhead box (Fox) factors are reported to be expressed in the foregut endoderm and are subsequently detected in a spatio-temporal pattern during lung development. Some of these factors were reported to influence the expression of lung marker proteins or to modulate lung development. To clarify the molecular mechanisms for generating functional lung cells from progenitor cell populations, we introduced the forkhead box factors. FoxA1 and FoxA2, and the homeobox factor, HoxB3, into the differentiation process in a multipotent hamster lung epithelial M3E3/C3 cell line. Ectopic expression of FoxA2 promoted differentiation to Clara-like cells with up-regulation of the expression of the lung marker proteins, Clara cell-specific 10-kDa protein and surfactant protein-B. In contrast, FoxA1 repressed the differentiation. HoxB3 transfection induced FoxA2 expression transiently at the pre-differentiation stage. The endogenous HoxB3 expression level decreased at later stages of Clara-like cell differentiation, and the attenuation was enhanced by FoxA2 transfection. HoxB3 is a putative Upstream regulator that enhances FoxA2 expression at the pre-differentiation stage. In addition, we found that the expression of HoxA4, HoxA5, and HoxC9 increased differentially during Clara-like cell differentiation. These results suggest that HoxB3 may be a putative positive regulator of FoxA2 expression at the pre-differentiation stage, and those interactions of Fox factors and Hox factors could participate in Clara cell differentiation. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据