4.8 Article

Electro-oxidation of glycerol at Pd based nano-catalysts for an application in alkaline fuel cells for chemicals and energy cogeneration

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 93, 期 3-4, 页码 354-362

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.008

关键词

Alkaline fuel cell; Glycerol; In situ infrared spectroscopy; Oxidation; Cold; Nickel; Palladium

资金

  1. CNRS (French National Center for Scientific Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon supported Pd, Pt, Au and bimetallic PdAu and PdNi nano-catalysts with different compositions were synthesized. Their catalytic activity toward glycerol electro-oxidation was evaluated in alkaline medium. Physical and electrochemical methods where used to characterize the structure and the surface of the catalysts. It was shown that the PdxAu1-x/C catalysts were alloys, which present an increase of crystallite (XRD) and particle (TEM) sizes with increasing Au atomic fraction. Their surfaces were palladium rich whatever the Pd atomic ratio. The structure of the Pd0.5Ni0.5/C catalyst is much more difficult to understand, but it seems to be composed of a palladium phase in interaction with a Ni(OH)(2) phase. The onset potential of glycerol oxidation is ca. 0.15 V lower on Pt/C than on Pd/C and Au/C. All PdxMe1-x/C catalysts presented lower onset potential than monometallic Au/C and Pd/C ones, but higher than Pt/C. For bimetallic catalysts, the order of activity at low potentials is: Pd0.3Au0.7/C > Pd0.5Au0.5/C > Pd0.5Ni0.5/C. Electrochemical experiments and in situ infrared spectroscopy measurements have shown that glycerol electro-oxidation mechanism is dependent on the catalyst, leading to different reaction products. Adsorbed CO species are detected on monometallic Pt and on I'd rich catalysts, but not on Au and Pd0.3Au0.7 catalysts, indicating that they are not able to break the C-C bond. The formation of hydroxypyruvate ion, which is a costly chemical product, is detected on pure gold catalyst. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据