4.8 Article

Au-decorated NaxH2-xTi3O7 nanobelts exhibiting remarkable photocatalytic properties under visible-light illumination

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 97, 期 3-4, 页码 389-397

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.04.023

关键词

Titanate; Nanobelts; Photocatalysis; Visible-light-driven; Charge separation

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [NSC-98-2113-M-009-015-MY2, NSC-98-2218-E-009-003]
  2. National Chiao Tung University [99W963]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrated for the first time that Na-intercalated H2Ti3O7 (NaxH2-xTi3O7) NBs, prepared in the typical alkaline hydrothermal process, can effectively absorb visible light to carry out photocatalytic reactions. With the capability of effective light absorption in visible range, NaxH2-xTi3O7 NBs performed much better in the photoclegradation of thionine than the other three counterpart products including H2Ti3O7, mixed Na2Ti6O13/TiO2 and anatase TiO2 under visible-light irradiations. As compared to the relevant commercial products like P-25 TiO2 and Na2Ti3O7 powders, the as-synthesized NaxH2-xTi3O7 NBs exhibited superior photocatalytic efficiency under UV illumination, demonstrating their potential as an efficient photocatalyst in relevant redox reactions. A further enhancement in the photocatalytic activity can be achieved for NaxH2-xTi3O7 NBs when Au nanoparticles of suitable amount were deposited on their surfaces. This improvement is due to the band offsets between NaxH2-xTi3O7 and Au, which may promote charge carrier separation to favor the photocatalysis. The recycling test reveals that Au-decorated NaxH2-xTi3O7 NBs could be promisingly utilized in the long-term course of photocatalysis. Furthermore, the result of performance evaluation under natural sunlight shows that the current Au-decorated NaxH2-xTi3O7 NBs can be used as highly efficient photocatalysts which may practically harvest energy from sunlight. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据