4.8 Article

Capillary microchannel-based microreactors with highly durable ZnO/TiO2 nanorod arrays for rapid, high efficiency and continuous-flow photocatalysis

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 93, 期 3-4, 页码 376-382

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.011

关键词

ZnO/TiO2 nanorod; Capillary microreactor; Photocatalytic; Continuous-flow system

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of China [NECT-05-0419]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [07SG37]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [50772022, 50772127]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B603]
  5. Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project [708039]
  6. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline [111-2-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel, highly durable capillary-based photocatalytic microreactor containing TiO2 nanoparticle-coated ZnO nanorod arrays grown on the inner wall of the capillaries (IWC) was successfully constructed simply by pumping a TiO2 Sol into capillaries containing preformed ZnO nanorod arrays. Methylene blue was used as a model organic compound to evaluate the photocatalytic performance of the capillary microreactors (CMs). The CMs containing ZnO/TiO2 nanorod arrays showed higher photocatalytic performance than a CM containing only ZnO nanorods at the same residence time. The effect of the number of TiO2 sol coatings and the recyclable properties of the CM were investigated. These CMs showed rapid and highly efficient photocatalytic activities and the ZnO/TiO2 nanorod arrays displayed high durability during continuous recycling. The superior photocatalytic activity of the ZnO/TiO2 nanorod-modified CMs was attributed to the topographical morphology induced by the nanorod arrays, and the combination of two semiconductors decreasing the recombination rate of photoinduced electrons and holes. These CMs show the promising application of the photodegradation of organic pollutants. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据