4.8 Review

Carbon supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 88, 期 1-2, 页码 1-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.030

关键词

Fuel cells; Catalysts; Platinum; Carbon; Nanomaterials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To increase their electrochemically active surface area, catalysts supported on high surface area materials, commonly carbons, are widely used in low-temperature fuel cells. Recent studies have revealed that the physical properties of the carbon support can greatly affect the electrochemical properties of the fuel cell catalyst. It has been reported that carbon materials with both high surface area and good crystallinity can not only provide a high dispersion of Pt nanoparticles, but also facilitate electron transfer, resulting in better device performance. On this basis, novel non-conventional carbon materials have attracted much interest as electrocatalyst support because of their good electrical and mechanical properties and their versatility in pore size and pore distribution tailoring. These materials present a different morphology than carbon blacks both at the nanoscopic level in terms of their pore texture (for example mesopore carbon) and at the macroscopic level in terms of their form (for example microsphere). The examples are supports produced from ordered mesoporous carbons, carbon aerogels, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorns, carbon nanocoils and carbon nanofibers. The challenge is to develop carbon supports with high surface area, good electrical conductivity, suitable porosity to allow good reactant flux, and high stability in fuel cell environment, utilizing synthesis methods simple and not too expensive. This paper presents an overview of carbon supports for Pt-based catalysts, with particular attention on new carbon materials. The effect of substrate characteristics on catalyst properties, as electrocatalytic activity and stability in fuel cell environment, is discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据