4.5 Article

SSTR5 ablation in islet results in alterations in glucose homeostasis in mice

期刊

FEBS LETTERS
卷 579, 期 14, 页码 3107-3114

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.069

关键词

G-protein; beta-cell specific knockdown; global knockout

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [NIDDK R01-DK46441] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatostatin (SST) peptide is a potent inhibitor of insulin secretion and its effect is mediated via somatostatin receptor 5 (SSTR5) in the endocrine pancreas. To investigate the consequences of gene ablation of SSTR5 in the mouse pancreas, we have generated a mouse model in which the SSTR5 gene was specifically knocked down in the pancreatic beta cells (beta SSTR5(Kd)) using the Cre-lox system. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that SSTR5 gene expression was absent in beta cells at three months of age. At the time of gene ablation, PSSTR5(Kd) mice demonstrated glucose intolerance with lack of insulin response and significantly reduced serum insulin levels. Insulin tolerance test demonstrated a significant increase of insulin clearance in vivo at the same age. In vitro studies demonstrated an absence of response to SST-28 stimulation in the PSSTR5(Kd) mouse islet, which was associated with a significantly reduced SST expression level in PSSTR5(Kd) mice pancreata. In addition, PSSTR5(Kd) mice had significantly reduced serum glucose levels and increased serum insulin levels at 12 months of age. Glucose tolerance test at an older age also indicated a persistently higher insulin level in PSSTR5(Kd) mice. Further studies of PSSTR5(Kd) mice had revealed elevated serum C-peptide levels at both 3 and 12 months of age, suggesting that these mice are capable of producing and releasing insulin to the periphery. These results support the hypothesis that SSTR5 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of insulin secretion in the mouse pancreas. (c) 2005 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据