4.7 Article

Synthesis, characterisation and catalytic evaluation of mesoporous AlPO supported phosphotungstic acid in the ethylation of ethylbenzene

期刊

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
卷 81, 期 1-3, 页码 59-71

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.01.018

关键词

mesoporous aluminophosphates; heteropolyacids; PW/AlPOs; ethylation; p-diethylbenzene; hexaethylbenzene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hexagonal mesoporous aluminophosphate (AlPO) was synthesised at room temperature using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as the structure-directing agent. The mesoporosity of the synthesised material was confirmed from low angle XRD, TGA and nitrogen physisorption studies. Its textural properties were analysed with SEM and the framework vibrations by FT-IR. Al-27 and P-31 MAS NMR spectra revealed tetrahedral co-ordination of Al and P. The mesoporous AlPO was then impregnated with phosphotungstic acid, H3PW12O40 (PW), of various loadings viz., 10, 20 and 40 wt% of PW. The PW loaded AlPOs were characterised by XRD, FT-IR, BET, DRIFT and P-31 MAS NMR techniques. XRD patterns reveal the presence of Keggin structure in 20 and 40 wt% PW/AlPO. Temperature programmed desorption of pyridine by DRIFT studies indicate modified acidity values due to transfer of protons to the support AlPO. The catalytic activity of the materials was examined in the vapour phase ethylation of ethylbenzene with diethyl carbonate at temperatures between 200 and 275 degrees C. 20 wt% PW/AlPO was found to be more active than 10 and 40 wt% PW/AlPO catalysts. Among the alkylated products, the most significant product is hexaethylbenzene, obtained only with 20 wt% PW/AlPO. The selectivity of p-diethylbenzene is higher than for other alkylated products. The time on stream study over 20 wt% PW/AlPO catalyst indicates similar activity for about 4 h of stream. The effect of feed ratio and WHSV on conversion and product selectivity was also examined and the results are discussed. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据