4.6 Article

Antigen binding forces of single antilysozyme Fv fragments explored by atomic force microscopy

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 5517-5523

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la050162e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB-002027] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to explore the antigen binding forces of individual Fv fragments of antilysozyme antibodies (Fv). To detect single molecular recognition events, genetically engineered histidine-tagged Fv fragments were coupled onto AFM tips modified with mixed self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of nitrilotriacetic acid- and tri(ethylene glycol)-terminated alkanethiols while lysozyme (Lyso) was covalently immobilized onto mixed SAMs of carboxyl- and hydroxyl-terminated alkanethiols. The quality of the functionalization procedure was validated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (surface chemical composition), AFM imaging (surface morphology in aqueous solution), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR, specific binding in aqueous solution). AFM force-distance curves recorded at a loading rate of 5000 pN/s between Fv- and Lyso-modified surfaces yielded a distribution of unbinding forces composed of integer multiples of an elementary force quantum of similar to 50 pN that we attribute to the rupture of a single antibody-antigen pair. Injection of a solution containing free Lyso caused a dramatic reduction of adhesion probability, indicating that the measured 50 pN unbinding forces are due to the specific antibody-antigen interaction. To investigate the dynamics of the interaction, force-distance curves were recorded at various loading rates. Plots of unbinding force vs log(loading rate) revealed two distinct linear regimes with ascending slopes, indicating multiple barriers were present in the energy landscape. The kinetic off-rate constant of dissociation (k(off) approximate to 1 x 10(-3) s(-1)) obtained by extrapolating the data of the low-strength regime to zero force was in the range of the k(off) estimated by SPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据