4.8 Article

Study of Pt-CeO2 interaction and the effect in the selective hydrodechlorination of trichloroethylene

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 87, 期 1-2, 页码 84-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.08.018

关键词

Dechlorination; Trichloroethylene; Pt/CeO2; Ethylene

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [A196/2007/2-07.1
  2. 246/2006/3-7.1]
  3. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente [HU2006-0026, 246/2006/3-7.1]
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya (Spain) [Q9999/2007/309-118]
  5. Austrian Academic Exchange Service [ES 05/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of a catalytic technology to remediate waste streams of halogenated compounds has been improved in order to increase the selectivity towards valuable compounds. Two series of Pt/CeO2 catalysts prepared by different synthesis protocol, co-combustion and impregnation, have been tested in hydrodechlorination of trichloroethylene in gas phase at mild reaction conditions (temperature between 100 and 300 degrees C, and 1 bar of pressure). The catalytic behaviour of Pt-Al2O3 catalysts was also studied for comparison. Several techniques (BET, XRD, FTIR, HRTEM, etc.) were performed for catalysts characterization. Using the combustion method, the platinum is introduced into ceria matrix, whereas by the impregnation one, the platinum particles are deposited on the surface. In both cases a strong interaction between the support and the platinum particles is observed. Smaller platinum particles sizes are obtained using the impregnation method when compared with the combustion one. When the main product for Pt-Al2O3 catalysts was ethane, the use of CeO2 as support increased the ethylene selectivity. Platinum catalysts obtained by combustion method showed the highest selectivity to ethylene. These results indicate that both the presence of CeO2 as support and the interaction between ceria and platinum play an important role in the selectivity to ethylene. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据