4.7 Article

Structural analysis of dispersin B, a biofilm-releasing glycoside hydrolase from the periodontopathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 349, 期 3, 页码 475-486

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.082

关键词

beta-hexosaminidase; crystal structure; complex; exopolysaccharide hydrolysis; biofilm

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE12585, DE151124] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria in a biofilm are enmeshed in a self-synthesized extracellular polysaccharide matrix that holds the bacteria together in a mass and firmly attaches the bacterial mass to the underlying surface. A major component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix in several phylogenetically diverse bacteria is PGA, a linear polymer of N-acetylglucosamine residues in beta(1,6)-linkage. PGA is produced by the Gram-negative periodonto-pathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans as well as by the Grain-positive device-associated pathogen Staphylococcus epidermidis. We recently reported that A. actinomycetemcomitans produces a soluble glycoside hydrolase named dispersin B, which degrades PGA. Here, we present the crystal structure of dispersin B at 2.0 angstrom in complex with a glycerol and an acetate ion at the active site. The enzyme crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group C222(1) with cell dimensions a = 41.02 angstrom, b 86.13 angstrom, c=185.77 angstrom. The core of the enzyme consists a (beta/alpha)(8) barrel topology similar to other-hexosaminidases but significant differences exist in the arrangement of loops hovering in the vicinity of the active site. The location and interactions of the glycerol and acetate moieties in conjunction with the sequence analysis suggest that dispersin B cleaves beta(1,6)-linked N-acetylglucosamine polymer using a catalytic machinery similar to other family 20 hexosaminidases which cleave (1,4)-linked N-acetylglucosamine residues. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据