4.7 Article

Is it true dioxygenase or classic autoxidation catalysis?: Re-investigation of a claimed dioxygenase catalyst based on a Ru2-incorporated, polyoxometalate precatalyst

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 4175-4188

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic050090e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 1997 Nature paper (Nature 1997, 388, 353-355) and a 1998 J. Am. Chem. Soc. paper (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11969-11976) reported that a novel Ru-2-incorporated sandwich-type polyoxometalate, {[WZnRu2III(OH)(H2O)-(Zn)N9O34)(2)}(11-), is an all-inorganic dioxygenase catalyst for the hydroxylation of adamantane and the epoxidation ofalkenes using molecular oxygen. Specifically, it was reported that the above RU2-containing polyoxometalate catalyzes the following reaction by a non-radical-chain, dioxygenase mechanism: 2RH + O-2 -> 2ROH (R = adamantane). A re-investigation of the above claim has been performed, resulting in the following findings: (1) iodometric analysis detects trace peroxides (0.5% relative to adamantane), the products of free-radical-chain autoxidation, at the end of the adamantane hydroxylation reaction; (2) a non-dioxygenase product, (H2O)-O-18, is observed at the end of an adamantane hydroxylation reaction performed using 1802; (3) kinetic studies reveal a fractional rate law consistent with a classic radical-chain reaction; (4) a non-dioxygenase similar to 1:1 adamantane products/O-2 stoichiometry is observed in our hands (instead of the claimed 2:1 adamantane/O-2 dioxygenase stoichiometry); (5) adamantane hydroxylation is initiated by the free radical initiator, AIBN (2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile), or the organic hydroperoxide, t-BuOOH; (6) four radical scavengers completely inhibit the reaction; and (7) [WZnRu2III(OH)(H2O)-(ZnW9O34)(2)}(11-) is found to be an effective catalyst for cyclohexene f ree-radical-chain autoxidation. The above results are consistent with and strongly supportive of a free-radical-chain mechanism, not the previously claimed dioxygenase pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据