4.8 Article

Vapor phase oxidation of dimethyl sulfide with ozone over V2O5/TiO2 catalyst

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 84, 期 3-4, 页码 408-419

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.04.025

关键词

Catalytic ozonation; Dimethyl sulfide; Vanadia-titania; Reaction pathway

资金

  1. Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the US Department of Energy and the US Environmental Protection Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The removal of volatile and odorous emissions from pulp and paper industrial processes usually generates secondary pollution which is treated further by scrubbing, adsorption, and catalytic incineration. Studies using a now reactor packed with 10% vanadia/titania (V2O5/TiO2) catalyst showed complete conversion of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) in the presence of ozone. The molar yields of partial oxidation products were only 10-20%. Small amounts of partial oxidation products, such as and dimethyl sulfone (DMSO2), dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), were also formed. The results of the oxidation of DMS using ozone only, ozone plus catalyst, and oxygen plus catalyst suggest that the combined use of O-3 with catalyst is essential for the complete destruction of DMS to CO2 and SO2. A Box-Behnken design was used to determine the factors that have a significant effect on the conversion and selectivity of the products. It was concluded that product selectivity is strongly influenced by temperature, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV), and ozone concentration. The catalysts were characterized using XRD, surface area measurements, and SEM techniques. Time-on-stream studies carried out in a 500 ppmv gas stream held at 150 degrees C for 6 h, using 2 g of the catalyst, an ozone-to-DMS molar ratio of 0.9, and a GHSV of 37,000 h(-1), yielded 99.9% conversion of DMS. A plausible reaction mechanism has been proposed for the oxidation of DMS based on reaction product distribution and possible intermediates formed. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据