4.7 Article

Parkinson disease - Handedness predicts asymmetry

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 64, 期 11, 页码 1925-1930

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163993.82388.C8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the proportion of individuals in a clinic-based setting that present with asymmetric Parkinson disease (PD) and identify predictive factors associated with asymmetric symptoms. Methods: The authors examined right vs left difference scores on the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale motor subscale in a consecutive clinical series of 1,277 individuals diagnosed with PD. Predictors of asymmetry included sex, symptomatic disease duration, age at onset, initial motor symptom laterality, handedness, and medical history variables ( e. g., family history of PD). Results: Nearly half the sample (46 %) met criteria for asymmetric disease based on a right vs left difference score of >= 5 points, and 12 % of the sample had a difference score of >= 10 ( difference score: mean >= 4, SD = 3.4). All three cardinal features of PD showed characteristics of asymmetric disease presentation. Multiple regression analyses showed that an increased discrepancy between right- and left-sided symptoms was significantly associated with a shorter disease duration, younger age at symptomatic onset, asymmetric initial symptom onset, hand dominance, and a positive self-reported family history of other'' neurodegenerative disorder. Hand dominance was related to the side of asymmetric disease such that left-handed individuals tended to have more severe disease on the left side of the body. Conclusion: Asymmetric presentation of Parkinson disease features was a common occurrence in the clinical cohort. Asymmetry was reliably predicted by several clinical characteristics, although the moderate level of explained variance (i.e., between 16 and 23 %) highlighted the need for additional research examining predictive models of asymmetric disease. Recommendations for the classification and measurement of asymmetric disease are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据