4.7 Article

Regulation of ileal bile acid-binding protein expression in Caco-2 cells by ursodeoxycholic acid: Role of the farnesoid X receptor

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 1755-1763

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.03.019

关键词

bile acids; ursodeoxycholic acid; chenodeoxycholic acid; Caco-2 cells; ileal bile acid-binding protein; mRNA; farnesoid X receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is beneficial in cholestatic diseases but its molecular mechanisms of action remain to be clearly elucidated. Other bile acids, such as chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), are agonists for the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and regulate the expression of genes relevant for bile acid and cholesterol homeostasis. In ileal cells CDCA, through the FXR, up-regulates the expression of the ileal bile acid-binding protein (IBABP), implicated in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids. We report that UDCA (100 and 200 mu M) induced a moderate increase of IBABP mRNA ( approximate to 10% of the effect elicited by 50 mu M CDCA) in enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells and approximately halved the potent effect of CDCA (50 mu M). On the contrary, UDCA reduced by 80-90% CDCA-induced IBABP transcription in hepatocarcinoma derived HepG2 cells. We confirmed that these effects on IBABP transcription required the FXR by employing a cell-based transactivation assay. Finally, in a receptor binding assay, we found that UDCA binds to FXR expressed in CHO-K1 cells (K-d = 37.7 mu M). Thus, UDCA may regulate IBABP in Caco-2 cells, which express it constitutively, by acting as a partial agonist through a FXR mediated mechanism. The observation that in HepG2 cells, which do not express constitutively IBABP, UDCA was able to almost completely prevent CDCA-induced activation of IBABP promoter, suggests that tissue-specific factors, other than FXR, may be required for bile acid regulation of FXR target genes. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据