4.4 Article

Proverb comprehension reconsidered -: 'theory of mind' and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
卷 75, 期 2-3, 页码 233-239

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.11.006

关键词

proverbs; metaphor; pragmatics; theory of mind; social contract theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: For decades, impaired proverb comprehension has been regarded as typical of schizophrenic thought disorder. Testing patients' proverb understanding has widely been abandoned, however, due to poor reliability and validity of the assessment procedures. Since the underlying cognitive deficit of impaired proverb interpretation remained obscure, this study sought to determine the relation of proverb understanding with other cognitive domains, particularly 'theory of mind' or 'mindreading', in schizophrenia. Methods: 31 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were assessed using a novel German Proverb Test [Barth, A., Kufferle, B., 2001. Die Entwicklung eines Sprichworttests zur Erfassung konkretistischer Denkstorungen bei schizophrenen Patienten. Nervenarzt 72, 853-858.], a 'theory of mind' test battery, a variety of executive functioning tests and verbal intelligence. Psychopathology was measured using the PANSS [Kay, S.R., Opler, L.A., Lindenmayer, J.P., 1989. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): rationale and standardisation. Br. J. Psychiatry 158 (suppl. 7), 59-67.]. Patients' task performance was compared to a group of healthy control persons. Results: 'Theory of mind, executive functioning and intelligence were strongly correlated with patients' ability to interpret proverbs correctly. In a regression analysis 'theory of mind' performance predicted, conservatively estimated, about 39% of the variance of proverb comprehension in the patient group. Conclusions: The ability to interpret such metaphorical speech that is typical of many proverbs crucially depends on schizophrenic patients' ability to infer mental states. Future studies may further address differences between schizophrenia subtypes or the relation to specific symptom clusters. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据