4.8 Article

Production of middle distillate in a dual-bed reactor from synthesis gas through wax cracking: Effect of acid property of Pd-loaded solid acid catalysts on the wax conversion and middle distillate selectivity

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 83, 期 3-4, 页码 195-201

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.02.022

关键词

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS); synthesis gas; middle distillate; dual-bed reactor; wax cracking

资金

  1. Korea Energy Management Corporation [2006-11-0133-3-020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective production of middle distillate (C-10-C-20) from synthesis gas (CO + H-2) was carried out in a dual-bed reactor. Co-based catalysts were used in the first-bed reactor to produce wax (C21+) from synthesis gas, and Pd-loaded solid acid catalysts were used in the second-bed reactor to produce middle distillate from wax through hydrocracking. Co/TiO2 catalyst in the first-bed reactor produced more than 35 wt% middle distillate and more than 20 wt% wax. These products served as a suitable feed for the production of middle distillate through hydrocracking in the second-bed reactor. Pd-loaded solid acid catalysts used in the second-bed reactor retained three types of acid sites (weak-, medium-, and strong-acid sites). Correlations between medium acidity and catalytic activity of Pd-loaded solid acid catalyst revealed that wax conversion and increment of middle distillate selectivity in the second-bed reactor were increased with increasing medium acidity of the catalyst. Total acidity of Pd-loaded solid acid catalyst was increased with increasing medium acidity of the catalyst. Thus, the medium acidity (total acidity) of Pd-loaded solid acid catalyst served as a crucial factor in hydrocracking of wax. Among the second-bed catalysts, the Pd/mesoporous alumina (Pd/MA) catalyst with the highest medium acidity (total acidity) showed the best catalytic performance (ca. 83% wax conversion and ca. 15 wt% increment of middle distillate selectivity). (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据