4.7 Article

Tumor necrosis factor-α overexpression in lung disease -: A single cause behind a complex phenotype

期刊

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200410-1349OC

关键词

emphysema; micro-computed tomography; plethysmography; pulmonary fibrosis

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR15557] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL67273] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) has been implicated as a key cytokine in many inflammatory lung diseases. These effects are currently unclear, because a transgenic mouse overexpressing TNF-a in the lung has been shown in separate studies to produce elements of both emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis. Objectives: We sought to elucidate the phenotypic effects of TNF-alpha overexpression in a mouse model. Measurements: We established the phenotype by measuring lung impedance and thoracic gas volume, and using micro-computed tomography and histology. Main Results:We found that airways resistance in this mouse was not different to control mice, but that lung tissue dampening, elastance, and hysteresivity were significantly elevated. Major heterogeneous abnormalities of the parenchyma were also apparent in histologic sections and in micro-computed tomography images of the lung. These changes included airspace enlargement, loss of small airspaces, increased Collagen, and thickened pleural septa. We also found significant increases in lung and chest cavity volumes in the TNF-alpha-overexpressing mice. Conclusions:We conclude that TNF-alpha overexpression causes pathologic changes consistent with both emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis combined with a general lung inflammation, and consequently does not model any single human disease. Our study thus confirms the pleiotropic effects of TNF-alpha, which has been implicated in multiple inflammatory disorders, and underscores the necessity of using a wide range of investigative techniques to link gene expression and phenotype in animal models of disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据