4.8 Article

Treatment of ulcerative colitis with a humanized antibody to the α4β7 integrin

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 352, 期 24, 页码 2499-2507

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042982

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Selective blockade of interactions between leukocytes and vascular endothelium in the gut is a promising strategy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of MLN02, a humanized antibody to the (alpha)(sub 4)(beta)(sub 7) integrin, in patients with active ulcerative colitis. We randomly assigned 181 patients to receive 0.5 mg of MLN02 per kilogram of body weight, 2.0 mg per kilogram, or an identical-appearing placebo intravenously on day 1 and day 29. Eligible patients also received concomitant mesalamine or no other treatment for colitis. Ulcerative colitis clinical scores and sigmoidoscopic assessments were evaluated six weeks after randomization. RESULTS: Clinical remission rates at week 6 were 33 percent, 32 percent, and 14 percent for the group receiving 0.5 mg of MLN02 per kilogram, the group receiving 2.0 mg per kilogram, and the placebo group, respectively (P=0.03). The corresponding proportions of patients who improved by at least 3 points on the ulcerative colitis clinical score were 66 percent, 53 percent, and 33 percent (P=0.002). Twenty-eight percent of patients receiving 0.5 mg per kilogram and 12 percent of those receiving 2.0 mg per kilogram had endoscopically evident remission, as compared with 8 percent of those receiving placebo (P=0.007). For the minority of patients in whom an MLN02 antibody titer greater than 1:125 developed, incomplete saturation of the (alpha)(sub 4)(beta)(sub 7) receptor on circulating lymphocytes was observed and no benefit of treatment was identifiable. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study, MLN02 was more effective than placebo for the induction of clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据