4.7 Article

Tracing the nuclear accretion history of the red galaxy population

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 626, 期 2, 页码 723-732

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/430124

关键词

cosmology : observations; galaxies : active; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular; cD galaxies : evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the evolution of the hard X-ray luminosity of the red galaxy population using a large sample of 3316 red galaxies selected over a wide range in redshift (0.3 < z < 0.9) from a 1.4 deg(2) region in the Bootes field of the NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey (NDWFS). The red galaxies are early-type, bulge-dominated galaxies and are selected to have the same evolution-corrected, absolute R-band magnitude distribution as a function of redshift to ensure that we are tracing the evolution in the X-ray properties of a comparable optical population. Using a stacking analysis of 5 ks Chandra/ACIS observations within this field to study the X-ray emission from these red galaxies in three redshift bins, we find that the mean X-ray luminosity increases as a function of redshift. The large mean X-ray luminosity and the hardness of the mean X-ray spectrum suggest that the X-ray emission is largely dominated by active galactic nuclei (AGNs) rather than stellar sources. The hardness ratio can be reproduced by either an absorbed (N-H approximate to 2 x 10(22) cm(-2)) Gamma = 1.7 power-law source, consistent with that of a population of moderately obscured Seyfert-like AGNs, or an unabsorbed Gamma = 0: 7 source, suggesting a radiatively inefficient accretion flow ( e. g., an advection-dominated accretion flow). We also find that the emission from this sample of red galaxies constitutes at least 5% of the hard X-ray background. These results suggest a global decline in the mean AGN activity of normal early-type galaxies from z similar to 1 to the present, which indicates that we are witnessing the tailing off of the accretion activity onto supermassive black holes in early-type galaxies since the quasar epoch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据