4.6 Article

Acid site properties of thermally stable, silica-doped alumina as a function of silica/alumina ratio and calcination temperature

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 482, 期 -, 页码 16-23

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.05.011

关键词

Silica-doped alumina; Bronsted and Lewis acid sites; Thermal stability; Acid site concentration

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  2. DOE [DE-FG02-05ER15666]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-0959862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acid site properties of silica-doped aluminas prepared by a simple solvent deficient hydrolysis of the alkoxides was investigated. The total acid concentration (Bronsted and Lewis sites) of silica-doped aluminas (SDAs) calcined in the range of 700-1200 degrees C with Si/AI ratios of 5, 15, 27 wt% was determined using temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (ammonia-TPD). Al-27 solid state MAS NMR (Al SS MAS NMR) was used to measure the intrinsic Lewis acid site concentration, and FTIR was also used as a separate measure of the Bronsted and Lewis acid site concentration. Results indicate that removing hydroxyl groups in the form of water molecules through calcination result in a lower concentration of Bronsted acid sites. Calcination at higher temperature also results in the transformation of unsaturated 5-coordinated aluminum (a strong Lewis acid) to higher concentrations of 6 and 4-coordinated aluminum in 5, 15 and 27% silica-doped alumina samples. Therefore, the total acid site concentration (Bronsted and Lewis sites) decreases by increasing the calcination temperature. In addition, the data show that increasing the silica/alumina ratio increases both the Bronsted and Lewis acid site concentrations. Based on these results, the acid site concentrations can be controlled by altering the Si/Al ratio and calcination temperature while maintaining high surface areas, large pore volumes, and large pore diameters. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据