4.6 Article

Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass with mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolites prepared by desilication with NaOH solutions

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 470, 期 -, 页码 115-122

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.10.040

关键词

Catalysis; Pyrolysis; Biomass; Hierarchical ZSM-5; Desilication

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Zhejiang Province [2012C21055]
  2. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [13Y01ESPCT]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2010BAC66B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of desilication of ZSM-5 zeolite on its catalytic properties in catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) of lignocellulosic biomass. A series of mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolites were prepared by desilication of a conventional microporous ZSM-5 zeolite with NaOH solutions of varying concentrationS (0.1-0.5 M). The creation of mesopores improved the diffusion property of the desilicated ZSM-5 zeolites and their catalytic activity for cracking bulky oxygenates (e.g., syringols derived from the lignin component of biomass). Consequently, the desilicated zeolites produced more aromatic hydrocarbons (carbon yields of 26.2-30.2%) and less coke (39.9-41.2%) in CFP of beech wood than the parent microporous ZSM-5 (23.2% aromatics and 44.4% coke). The highest aromatic yield (30.2%) and lowest coke yield (39.9%) were obtained in CFP of beech wood with mildly desilicated zeolite treated with 0.3 M NaOH solution. However, desilication with a greater concentration, 0.5 M NaOH, decreased the aromatic yield to 26.2% due to a considerable loss of microporosity in the severely desilicated zeolite. The results indicate that carefully controlled desilication of zeolite can improve the conversion of lignocellulose to valuable aromatic hydrocarbons and decrease the formation of undesired coke, thus improving the product distribution in CFP of lignocellulose. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据