4.6 Article

Identification of Trichomonas vaginalis cysteine proteases that induce apoptosis in human vaginal epithelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 25, 页码 23853-23860

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M501752200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41-RR10888, S10-RR015942] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI47334] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A secreted cysteine protease (CP) fraction from Trichomonas vaginalis is shown here to induce apoptosis in human vaginal epithelial cells (HVEC) and is analyzed by mass spectrometry. The trichomonad parasite T. vaginalis causes one of the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection in humans, trichomoniasis. The parasite as well as a secreted cysteine protease ( CP) fraction, isolated by affinity chromatography followed by Bio-Gel P-60 column chromatography, are shown to induce HVEC apoptosis, as demonstrated by the Cell Death Detection ELISA(PLUS) assay and annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate flow cytometry analyses. Initiation of apoptosis is correlated with protease activity because the specific CP inhibitor E-64 inhibits both activities. SDS-PAGE analysis of the CP fraction reveals triplet bands around 30 kDa, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight MS indicates two closely associated peaks of molecular mass 23.6 and 23.8 kDa. Mass spectral peptide sequencing of the proteolytically digested CPs results in matches to previously reported cDNA clones, CP2, CP3, and CP4 ( Mallinson, D. J., Lockwood, B. C., Coombs, G. H., and North, M. J. ( 1994) Microbiology 140, 2725 2735), as well as another sequence with high homology to CP4 (www.tigr.org). These last two species are the most abundant components of the CP fraction. The present results, suggesting that CP-induced programmed cell death may be involved in the pathogenesis of T. vaginalis infection in vivo, may have important implications for therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据