4.5 Article

Modeling of blend-based polymer nanocomposites using a knotted approximation of Young's modulus

期刊

IRANIAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 1039-1047

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13726-015-0391-7

关键词

Nanocomposite; Young's modulus; Modeling; Knotted approximation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A knotted approximation (KA) is proposed in order to predict the Young's modulus of blend-based polymer nanocomposites (BPNs). The BPN system is considered to have two fundamental constituents, a binary polymer blend and an effective phase (nanoparticle-containing phase). Therefore, the KA model was designed to combine the results of two different models which govern different hypothetical constituent elements of BPN systems. This was very helpful to enhance the accuracy of KA model by controlling parameters which affect each model. Furthermore, the application of different models was investigated to obtain the most efficient mathematical framework. Despite simple methodology of the KA model, the consistency of governing models on each constituent was considered as an important factor. Based on the wetting coefficient, the nanoparticles were considered to be in an individual phase of the binary polymer blend, so it could satisfy the presumptions of the effective phase. Considering the strong influences of nanoparticles on the percolation threshold of polymer phases, a general method was proposed to consider this important phenomenon. As a result, combining the fundamental concepts of KA constituent models enabled it to involve a wide range of critical parameters related to the BPN systems, e.g., morphology, random orientation of nanoparticles, nanoparticle/polymer interphase, phase inversion, polymer phase percolation threshold, etc. To evaluate the accuracy of KA model, different samples of polyamide/polyolefin elastomer/Cloisite 30B were prepared and subjected to stress-strain test in order to compare the predicted and actual values of BPNs Young's modulus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据