4.4 Article

Rational transformation of Lactobacillus reuteri 121 reuteransucrase into a dextransucrase

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 25, 页码 9206-9216

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi050447q

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucansucrase or glucosyltransferase (GTF) enzymes of lactic acid bacteria display high sequence similarity but catalyze synthesis of different alpha-glucans (e.g., dextran, mutan, alteman, and reuteran) from sucrose. The variations in glucosidic linkage specificity observed in products of different glucansucrase enzymes appear to be based on relatively small differences in amino acid sequences in their sugar-binding acceptor subsites. This notion was derived from mutagenesis of amino acids of GTFA (reuteransucrase) from Lactobacillus reuteri strain 121 putatively involved in acceptor substrate binding. A triple amino acid mutation (N1134S:N1135E:S1136V) in a region immediately next to the catalytic Asp1133 (putative transition state stabilizing residue) converted GTFA from a mainly alpha-(1-4) (similar to 45%, reuteran) to a mainly alpha-(1 -> 6) (similar to 80%, dextran) synthesizing enzyme. The subsequent introduction of mutation P1026V:I1029V, involving two residues located in a region next to the catalytic Asp 1024 (nucleophile), resulted in synthesis of an a-glucan containing only a very small percentage of alpha-(1 -> 4) glucosidic linkages (similar to 5%) and a further increased percentage of alpha-(1 -> 6) glucosidic linkages (similar to 85%). This changed glucosidic linkage specificity was also observed in the oligosaccharide products synthesized by the different mutant GTFA enzymes from (iso)maltose and sucrose. Amino acids crucial for glucosidic linkage type specificity of reuteransucrase have been identified in this report. The data show that a combination of mutations in different regions of GTF enzymes influences the nature of both the glucan and oligosaccharide products. The amino acids involved most likely contribute to sugar-binding acceptor subsites in glucansucrase enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据