4.7 Article

A microfluidic shadow imaging system for the study of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans in space

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 904-914

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2004.12.039

关键词

microfluidics; nematode; Caenorhabditis elegans; shadow imaging; video signal processing; space biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports on a miniaturized shadow imaging device for the investigation of the behavioral effects of spaceflight on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a widely used model organism for the experimental study of genetics, development. radiobiology, as well as behavior and aging. Severe volume and power constraints for the design of satellite payloads indicate the need to miniaturize of space biology experiments and measurement systems. To address this issue. an integrated shadow imager has been developed, It consists of a polycarbonate microculture chamber with a volume of 4 mu L that supports cultures of C elegans worms in liquid media. Gas exchange is enabled through a gas-permeable membrane forming the top of the chamber. Shadow images are acquired with it CMOS video camera chip attached to the bottom of the microchamber. Image artifacts due to diffraction at the worm bodies are reduced by decreasing illumination wavelength and object/camera distance. As an alternative to video acquisition, the filtered video Output signal is Used to determine worm activity, yielding a system that allows image acquisition in combination with a low-bandwidth activity Measurement, Using the described system, the activity of C elegans as a function of ambient temperature was measured. The nematodes were found to show an increase in stroke frequency with temperature. Data obtained by manual counting of worm strokes and the video signal showed good correlation. To our knowledge. this is the first demonstration of maintaining and monitoring C elegans in a microfluidic environment. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据