4.7 Article

A computational and experimental investigation of the interaction between the template molecule and the functional monomer used in the molecularly imprinted polymer

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 542, 期 2, 页码 186-192

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.03.032

关键词

molecularly imprinted polymer; binding energy; density functional theory; theophylline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A computational approach to screening monomer for preparing molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was proposed, using the binding energy, Delta E, of a template molecule and a monomer as a measure of their interaction. For a specified template molecule, a monomer of higher Delta E is suitable for preparing the MIP To examine the validity of this approach, theophylline (THO) was chosen as the template molecule and methacrylic acid (MAA), acrylamide (AA) and 2-(trifluoromethyl)acrylic acid (TFMAA) were as the functional monomers, respectively. Density functional theory (DFT) at B3LYP/6-31+G**//B3LYP/3-21G level was used to calculate Delta E. It was shown that TFMAA gave the largest Delta E while AA gave the smallest. The details of the interaction between the THO with these monomers were also given by this computing approach. The adsorption of THO on the MIP synthesized using different monomers was studied. The MIP synthesized using TFMAA as monomer showed the highest selectivity to THO while the MIP from AA gave the lowest, as predicted from the Delta E calculation. H-1 NMR spectroscopy showed that, compared to MAA and AA, a stronger H-bond interaction is formed between TFMAA and THO. FT-IR analysis of the MIPs prepared using these three monomers confirmed the existence of C=O and O-H groups, which forms H-bond with THO. The results described above have given an insight into the interaction between THO and the monomers, and shown the use of Delta E to facilitate the selection of monomers for the synthesis of MIP (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据