4.5 Article

Effects of Natustat™ supplementation efficiency and intestinal lesion scores on performance, feed in broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella

期刊

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
卷 130, 期 3-4, 页码 185-190

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.041

关键词

coccidiosis; broilers; Natustat (TM); performance; lesion scores

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of dietary supplementation of Natustat (TM), a propriety plant derived product (Alltech Inc., KY, USA) and Salinomycin, on performance, feed efficiency and intestinal lesion scores were observed during two Eimeria challenge trials in broiler chickens. In the first trial chickens were challenged with Eimeria sp. via infecting the litter with a known amount of Eimeria oocysts. In the second trial the source of the Eimeria challenge was the litter from the first trial and the same treatment groups were assigned to the same pens as in the initial trial. Birds were placed 55 per pen with seven pens per treatment. Performance parameters were recorded on days 21 and 42 during both trials. Intestinal lesion scores were assessed on days 14 and 21 during Trial I and on day 21 during Trial 2. Average weight gain and feed conversion ratios were significantly improved in the Natustat (TM) and Salinomycin treatment groups when compared to the non-supplemented infected group. Furthermore, lesion scores were lower on all sampling days in the Natustat (TM) and Salinomycin groups when compared to the non-supplemented group. However, only lesions associated with Eimeria tenella were significantly lowered by Natustat (TM) and Salinomycin supplementation. Natustat (TM) and Salinomycin were equivalent in alleviating the negative performance effects associated with coccidiosis challenge. In summary, Natustat (TM) has the potential to be used as a natural alternative to chemotherapeutic drugs for Eimeria control. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据