4.6 Article

The effect of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin on epithelial healing following photorefractive keratectomy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 140, 期 1, 页码 83-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.02.037

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of epithelial healing following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with two commercially available fourth,generation fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin (Zymar, Allergan, Irvine, California) and moxifloxacin (Vigamox, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas). DESIGN: Double-masked, randomized, prospective trial. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects received gatifloxacin in one eye and moxifloxacin in the fellow eye following PRK with a 9.0-mm epithelial defect. Patients were examined daily after surgery until the epithelium had healed completely in both eyes. Beginning on postoperative day 3, photos were taken and used to confirm epithelial healing or measure the area of residual epithelial defects. Healing times and defect sizes were compared using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: Both eyes healed on the same day in 18 of the 35 subjects (51.4%). In 13 of 35 (37.1%) subjects, the moxifloxacin,treated eye healed first, compared with only four of 35 (11.4%) subjects whose gatifloxacin-treated eye healed first. All six of the eyes that took 2 days longer than their fellow eye to heal were gatifloxacin-treated. Median healing time for both groups was 4 days (moxifloxacin range: 3 to 7 days; gatifloxacin range: 3 to 9 days; P =.01), but only 69% of gatifloxacin-treated eyes had healed by day 4 compared with 80% of the moxifloxacin,treated eyes. Overall, on each postoperative day, defect sizes were greater for the gatifloxacin-treated eyes. This difference was statistically significant on day 4 (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Eyes treated with moxifloxacin healed faster and had smaller defects compared with those treated with gatifloxacin. This provides another factor to consider in selecting antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal refractive surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据