4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Self-assembly of ionic-complementary peptides: a physicochemical viewpoint

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.12.048

关键词

self-assembly; peptides; ionic-complementarity; electrostatic interactions; amino acid sequence; secondary structure; nanostructure; nanofibers; nanotechnology; nanobiotechnology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major focus in the current development in nanotechnology and biotechnology is to find suitable molecular materials that are amenable to engineering design. Self-assembling, ionic-complementary peptides have recently emerged as one of the most promising biomolecular materials. We provide a brief review of recent research on these newly discovered peptides from a physicochemical point of view. This new class of peptides has a unique molecular structure of alternating positive and negative charge distributions, leading to ionic-complementarity. In addition to hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction, the ionic-complementarity contributes to peptide self-assembly. These peptides assume P-sheet secondary structure predominantly, and can further self-assemble into fibrils, membranes, and even hydrogels with an increase in peptide concentration or other physicochemical parameters. The self-assembly process is highly dependent on the peptide sequence, concentration, pH. presence of salts, and time (or kinetics). By varying these experimentally controllable factors, nanoscopic and/or macroscopic structures with great stability and functionality can be constructed. These nano/microstructures have various biomedical applications, including tissue engineering, drug/gene delivery and biological surface patterning. It is anticipated that molecular engineering of these ionic-complementary peptides will contribute in a significant way to the development of novel nanobiomaterials, and play air important role in the advance of rapidly emerging bionanotechnology fields. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据