4.7 Article

Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 901-913

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.3577405

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparisons of orthologous genomic DNA sequences call be used to characterize regions that have been subject to purifying selection and are enriched for functional elements. We here present the results of such ail analysis on ail alignment of sequences from 29 mammalian species. The alignment captures -3.9 neutral Substitutions per site and spans similar to 1.9 Mbp of the human genome. We identify constrained elements from 3 bp to over 1 kbp in length, covering similar to 5.5% of the human locus. Our estimate for the total amount of nonexonic constraint experienced by this locus is roughly twice that for exonic constraint. Constrained elements tend to Cluster, and we identify large constrained regions that correspond well with known functional elements. While constraint density inversely correlates with mobile element density, we also show the presence of unambiguously constrained elements overlapping mammalian ancestral repeats. In addition, we describe a number of elements in this region that have undergone intense purifying selection throughout mammalian evolution, and we show that these important elements are more numerous than previously thought. These results were obtained with Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP), a statistically rigorous and biologically transparent framework for constrained element identification. CERP identifies regions at high resolution that exhibit nucleotide substitution deficits, and measures these deficits as rejected substitutions. Rejected substitutions reflect the intensity of past Purifying selection and are used to rank and characterize constrained elements. We anticipate that GERP and the types of analyses it facilitates will provide further insights and improved annotation for the human genome as mammalian genome sequence data become richer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据