4.7 Article

Blood pressure control, drug therapy, and kidney disease

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 44-50

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000166746.04472.60

关键词

angiotensin converting enzyme; calcium channel blockers; hypertension; renal disease

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [5K24DK0281802] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension examined the effect on renal function decline of 2 blood pressure ( BP) goals ( low mean arterial pressure [ MAP] <= 92 versus usual MAP 102 to 107 mm Hg) and 3 antihypertensives ( ramipril versus amlodipine versus metoprolol). We previously reported that in all drug groups combined the BP intervention had similar effects on the primary outcome of glomerular filtration rate ( GFR) slope or the main secondary clinical composite outcome of end-stage renal disease ( ESRD), death, or GFR decline by 50% or 25 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). This report examines the effect of the BP intervention separately in the 3 drug groups. The BP effect was similar among the drug groups for either GFR slope or the main clinical composite. However, the BP effect differed significantly among the drug groups for the composite of ESRD or death ( P = 0.035) and ESRD alone ( P = 0.021). Higher event rates for amlodipine patients assigned to the usual BP goal ( 0.087 per patient-year for ESRD or death and 0.064 per patient-year for ESRD) were seen compared with the remaining groups of the factorial design ( range, 0.041 to 0.050 for ESRD or death; and range, 0.027 to 0.036 for ESRD). The low BP goal was associated with reduced risk of ESRD or death ( risk reduction 51%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 73%) and ESRD ( 54%; 8% to 77%) for amlodipine patients, but not for patients assigned to the other drug groups. These secondary analyses suggest a benefit of the low BP goal among patients assigned to amlodipine, but they must be interpreted cautiously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据