4.3 Article

Evidence for different pharmacological targets for imidazoline compounds inhibiting settlement of the barnacle Balanus improvisus

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.163

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the effect of eight different imidazoline/guanidinium compounds on the settlement and metamorphosis of larvae of the barnacle Balanus improvisus. These agents were chosen on the basis of their similar pharmacological classification in vertebrates and their chemical similarity to medetomidine and clonidine, previously described as highly potent settlement inhibitors (nanomolar range). Seven of the tested compounds were found to inhibit settlement in a dose-dependent manner in concentrations ranging from 100 nM to 10 mu M without any significant lethal effects. In vertebrate systems these substances have overlapping functions and interact with both alpha-adrenoceptors as well as imidazoline binding sites. Antagonizing experiments using the highly specific alpha(2)-antagonist methoxy-idazoxan or agmatine (the putative endogenous ligand at imidazoline receptors) were performed to discriminate between putative pharmacological mechanisms involved in the inhibition of cyprid settlement. Agmatine was not able to reverse the effect of any of the tested compounds. However, methoxy-idazoxan almost completely abolished the settlement inhibition mediated by guanabenz (alpha(2)-agonist, I-2 ligand), moxonidine (alpha(2)-agonist, I-1 ligand) and tetrahydrozoline (alpha-agonist, I-2 ligand). The actions of cirazoline (alpha(1)-agonist, I-2 ligand) BU 224 (I-2 ligand) and metrazoline (I-2 ligand) were not reversed by treatment with methoxyidazoxan. These results suggest that the settlement inhibition evoked by the I-2 ligands and alpha(2)-agonists used in this study of the neurologically simple but well-organized barnacle larva is mediated through different physiological targets important in the overall settlement process. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据