4.6 Article

Differential expression of VASP in normal lung tissue and lung adenocarcinomas

期刊

THORAX
卷 60, 期 7, 页码 576-581

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2004.037622

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein ( VASP) is associated with focal adhesions and is thought to have an important role in actin filament assembly and cell motility. We hypothesise that an increase in the expression of VASP is involved in the progression and invasion of lung adenocarcinomas in parallel to tumour progression. A study was undertaken to analyse VASP expression in normal lung tissue and lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: Human lung tissues with adenocarcinomas ( n = 26) were used. Normal lung tissue specimens ( n = 14) were taken from areas a standard distance ( 3 cm) from resected adenocarcinomas of patients who underwent surgical lung resection. Adenocarcinomas were classified according to pathological staging and histopathological grades. Tissues were stained for VASP using immunohistochemistry. Results: Normal lung pneumocytes showed no VASP expression while alveolar macrophages had the strongest immunoreactivity for VASP. Bronchial epithelium ( surface epithelium, goblet cells) and bronchial gland cells had a very weak immunoreactivity for VASP. Adenocarcinomas had significantly greater VASP expression than normal epithelium ( p< 0.001). Moreover, VASP expression in adenocarcinomas increased significantly with more advanced tumour stage ( p< 0.001). Conclusions: The spatial and differential expression of VASP in normal lung tissue and lung adenocarcinomas suggests that it is likely to be involved in the differentiation of normal lung cells to adenocarcinomas. The significant increase in the expression of VASP in adenocarcinomas in parallel to pathological staging suggests that it may regulate the invasive behaviour of lung adenocarcinomas as adenocarcinoma invasion is increased in more advanced tumours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据