4.7 Article

Modular neural networks to predict the nitrate distribution in ground water using the on-ground nitrogen loading and recharge data

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 851-871

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.05.001

关键词

nitrate; nitrogen; ground water; artificial neural network; modular neural network; agriculture; land use; GIS; contamination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial neural networks have proven to be an attractive mathematical toot to represent complex relationships in many branches of hydrology. Due to this attractive feature, neural networks are increasingly being applied in subsurface modeling where intricate physical processes and lack of detailed field data prevail. In this paper, a methodology using modular neural networks (MNN) is proposed to simulate the nitrate concentrations in an agriculture-dominated aquifer. The methodology relies on geographic information system (GIS) tools in the preparation and processing of the MNN input-output data. The basic premise followed in developing the MNN input-output response patterns is to designate the optimal radius of a specified circular-buffered zone centered by the nitrate receptor so that the input parameters at the upgradient areas correlate with nitrate concentrations in ground water. A three-step approach that integrates the on-ground nitrogen loadings, soil nitrogen dynamics, and fate and transport in ground water is described and the critical parameters to predict nitrate concentration using MNN are selected. The sensitivity of MNN performance to different MNN architecture is assessed. The applicability of MNN is considered for the Sumas-Blaine aquifer of Washington State using two scenarios corresponding to current land use practices and a proposed protection alternative. The results of MNN are further analyzed and compared to those obtained from a physically-based fate and transport model to evaluate the overall applicability of MNN. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据