4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Interactions among multiple genomes: Tsetse, its symbionts and trypanosomes

期刊

INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 691-698

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2005.02.012

关键词

tsetse; trypanosomiasis; symbiosis; paratransgenesis

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI051584] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insect-borne diseases exact a high public health burden and have a devastating impact on livestock and agriculture. To date, control has proved to be exceedingly difficult. One such disease that has plagued sub-Saharan Africa is caused by the protozoan African trypanosomes (Trypanosoma species) and transmitted by tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae). This presentation describes the biology of the tsetse fly and its interactions with trypanosomes as well as its symbionts. Tsetse can harbor up to three distinct microbial symbionts, including two enterics (Wigglesworthia glossinidia and Sodalis glossinidius) as well as facultative Wolbachia infections, which influence host physiology. Recent investigations into the genome of the obligate symbiont Wigglesworthia have revealed characteristics indicative of its long co-evolutionary history with the tsetse host species. Comparative analysis of the commensal-like Sodalis with free-living enterics provides examples of adaptations to the host environment (physiology and ecology), reflecting genomic tailoring events during the process of transitioning into a symbiotic lifestyle. From an applied perspective, the extensive knowledge accumulated on the genomic and developmental biology of the symbionts coupled with our ability to both express foreign genes in these microbes in vitro and repopulate tsetse midguts with these engineered microbes now provides a means to interfere with the host physiological traits which contribute to vector competence promising a novel tool for disease management. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据