4.6 Article

Quinoline antimalarials decrease the rate of β-hematin formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 99, 期 7, 页码 1532-1539

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2005.04.013

关键词

beta-hematin; hemozoin; chloroquine; amodiaquine; quinine; quinidine; malaria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strength of inhibition of beta-hematin (synthetic hemozoin or malaria pigment) formation by the quinoline antimalarial drugs chloroquine, amodiaquine, quinidine and quinine has been investigated as a function of incubation time. In the assay used, P-hematin formation was brought about using 4.5 M acetate, pH 4.5 at 60 degrees C. Unreacted hematin was detected by formation of a spectroscopically distinct low spin pyridine complex. Although, these drugs inhibit P-hematin formation when relatively short incubation times are used, it was found that beta-hematin eventually forms with longer incubation periods (< 8 h for chloroquine and > 8 h for quinine). This conclusion was supported by both infrared and X-ray powder diffraction observations. It was further found that the IC50 for inhibition of beta-hematin formation increases markedly with increasing incubation times in the case of the 4-aminoquinolines chloroquine and amodiaquine. By contrast, in the presence of the quinoline methanols quinine and quinidine the IC50 values increase much more slowly. This results in a partial reversal of the order of inhibition strengths at longer incubation times. Scanning electron microscopy indicates that beta-hematin crystals formed in the presence of chloroquine are more uniform in both size and shape than those formed in the absence of the drug, with the external morphology of these crystallites being markedly altered. The findings suggest that these drugs act by decreasing the rate of hemozoin formation, rather than irreversibly blocking its formation. This model can also explain the observation of a sigmoidal dependence of P-hematin inhibition on drug concentration. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据