4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Molecular and pharmacological analysis of an octopamine receptor from American cockroach and fruit fly in response to plant essential oils

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/arch.20076

关键词

octopamine receptors; Pa oa(1); OAMB; cAMP; calcium; plant essential oils; toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Octopamine receptors from American cockroach, Periplaneta americana (Pa oa(1)), and fruit fly, Drosophilo melonogaster(OAMB), were cloned and permanently expressed in HEK-293 cells, and found to activate adenylate cyclase activity and increase [Ca2+](i) levels through G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathways. Sequencing information (GenBank accession number AY333178) and functional data of Pa oar were recently published. Saturation binding analysis with H-3-yohimbine was performed with Pa oar and OAMB expressed in COS-7 cells. The K-d values were determined to be 28.4 and 43.0 nM, respectively. B-max was determined to be 11.8 and 8.04 pmol receptor/mg protein, respectively. Competitive binding data using cell membranes expressing either OAMB or Pa oar demonstrated significantly decreased binding activity in binding assays performed in the presence of plant essential oils, eugenol, cinnamic alcohol, and trans-anethole. Eugenol decreased CAMP level in HEK-293 cells expressing Pa oar, but trans-anethole increased CAMP in HEK-293 cells expressing OAMB. All three chemicals increased [Ca2+]i level in both cell models. Toxicity data against fruit flies and American cockroaches demonstrated species differences in response to treatment with tested plant essential oils. The toxicity of tested chemicals against wild type and octopamine mutant (iav) fly strains suggested that an octopamine receptor mediates the toxicity of cinnamic alcohol, eugenol, transantehole, and 2-phenethyl propionate against fruit flies. Collectively, the data suggest a correlation between cellular changes induced by tested plant essential oils and their toxicity against fruit fly and American cockroach. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据