4.6 Article

Selective hydrogenation of citral over Pt/KL type catalysts doped with Sr, La, Nd and Sm

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 401, 期 1-2, 页码 56-64

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.04.045

关键词

Pt/KL catalysts; Selective hydrogenation; Citral; Geraniol; Nerol, Promoters, Sr, La, Nd, Sm

资金

  1. MICINN Spain [CTQ-2008-06839-C03-01, 03-PPQ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Sr and some lanthanides (La, Nd, Sm) as promoters of Pt/KL supported catalysts is analyzed in the selective hydrogenation of citral in the liquid phase. Characterization of the catalysts by XRD, N-2 adsorption, H-2 chemisorption, TPD of NH3, XPS and competitive hydrogenation of benzene/toluene mixtures shows that impregnation of KL zeolite with Sr(NO3)(2) in aqueous solution, followed by calcination prior to the incorporation of Pt, increases the surface basicity of the zeolite, which hinders the dispersion of Pt and promotes the formation of electron-rich platinum nanoparticles (Pt delta-). Ion exchange of K+ by rare earth cations (La3+, Nd3+ and Sm3+) increases the surface acidity of the zeolite and favors the dispersion of Pt, but with preferential location at the external surface of the zeolite. Furthermore, acidity promotes the formation of electron-deficient metal species (Pt delta+). Catalytic performances for the citral hydrogenation at 323 K and 5 MPa show that strontium addition enhances the hydrogenation activity of Pt, thus favoring the formation of citronellol as main reaction product (S = 80%) and increasing the yield to geraniol and nerol. Lanthanides as countercations diminish the overall hydrogenation activity of Pt/KL catalysts, but improve their selectivity towards unsaturated alcohols. Selectivity towards the reaction products is related to the mode and strength of the electronic interactions of the conjugated unsaturated bonds of citral reactant molecules with the metal surface species Pt-0, Pt delta+ or Pt delta- on the zeolite. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据