4.5 Article

Effect of doxycycline on sulfur mustard-induced respiratory lesions in guinea pigs

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00475.2004

关键词

vesicant agents; blistering agents; proteases; doxycycline; protease inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guignabert, Christophe, Laurent Taysse, Jean-Henri Calvet, Emmanuelle Planus, Seraphin Delamanche, Stephane Galiacy, and Marie-Piad d'Ortho. Effect of doxycycline on sulfur mustard-induced respiratory lesions in guinea pigs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289: L67-L74, 2005. First published March 18, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajplung. 00475.2004.-Respiratory tract lesions induced by the chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard (SM) are characterized by epithelial damages associated with inflammatory cell infiltration. Here we evaluated the imbalance between gelatinase and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), and we tested pretreatment with the protease inhibitor doxycycline. Guinea pigs were intoxicated intratracheally with SM and evaluated 24 h after exposure. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) gelatinase activity of bronchial lavage (BL) fluid from SM-exposed guinea pigs was high compared with controls, as shown by both zymography and biotinylated substrate degradation, whereas TIMP-1 and -2 levels by immunoblotting were similar. Extensive areas of lysis were evidenced by in situ zymography, indicating imbalance between gelatinases and inhibitors towards net proteolytic activity. Doxycycline pretreatment resulted in 1) decreased gelatinase activity (zymography, free gelatinase activity assay, and in situ zymography); 2) decreased inflammation (BL fluid cellularity and protein level); and 3) dramatic decrease in histological epithelial lesions. Our results suggest inadequate levels of TIMP to counteract increased gelatinase activity and further support a role for MMP gelatinases in SM-induced respiratory lesions. They also suggest that doxycycline may hold promise as a therapeutic tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据