4.5 Article

Frontal dysfunction contributes to the genesis of hallucinations in non-demented Parkinsonian patients

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1339

关键词

hallucinations; Parkinson's disease; executive functions; frontal lobe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Hallucinations occur in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with reported prevalence ranging from 8% to 40%. Hallucinations are significantly associated with dementia in PD, but little is known about possible distinctive cognitive features of non-demented PD patients who develop hallucinations. Objective The aim of the study was to assess selected cognitive abilities in non-demented PD patients with and without hallucinations in order to identify specific neuropsychological correlates of such phenomena. Methods Forty-eight consecutive patients with PD and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) >= 23 were examined for the presence of hallucinations and assessed on standardized neuropsychological tasks for semantic and phonological fluency, verbal learning and logical abstract thinking; disease severity was staged according to Hoehn and Yahr scale. Results Fourteen (29.2%) of 48 patients experienced hallucinations. There was no difference between hallucinators and non-hallucinators on demographic variables, disease severity and dose of any pharmacological treatment. Disease duration was significantly longer in hallucinator vs non-hallucinator patients (p = 0.02). Patients with hallucinations scored significantly lower than patients without hallucinations only on verbal learning-immediate recall task (p = 0.0324), and semantic and phonological fluency tasks (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0036, respectively). Conclusions Our results suggest that PD patients with hallucinations show reduced performance on tasks that explore executive functioning as compared with non-hallucinators. Therefore, executive dysfunction may be considered as a risk factor for the development of hallucinations in non-demented PD patients. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据