4.6 Article

Remediation of actual groundwater polluted with nitrate by the catalytic reduction over copper-palladium supported on active carbon

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 361, 期 1-2, 页码 123-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.006

关键词

Nitrate; Groundwater; Catalytic reduction; Copper-palladium bimetal catalyst; Humic acid; Ion-exchange

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [20560717]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20560717] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic reduction of nitrate (NO3-) in groundwater over a Cu-Pd catalyst supported on active carbon was investigated in a gas-liquid co-current flow system at 298 K. Although Cu-Pd/active carbon, in which the Cu/Pd molar ratio was more than 0.66, showed high activity, high selectivity for the formation of N-2 and N2O (98%), and high durability for the reduction of 100 ppm NO3- in distilled water, the catalytic performance decreased during the reduction of NO3- in groundwater. The catalyst also irreversibly deactivated during the reaction in groundwater. The organic species in the groundwater caused the decrease in the catalytic performance and the irreversible catalyst deactivation. Ozone-treatment of the groundwater to remove the organic species substantially helped to maintain the catalytic activity and to halt the irreversible deactivation of the catalyst. Chloride ion (Cl-) in the groundwater also caused the decrease in the activity and selectivity, but the effects of Cl were reversible. Sulfate ion (SO42-) and cations, including Mg2+, Ca2+ and K+, had little or no effect on the catalytic performance of Cu-Pd/active carbon, though they were present in the groundwater sample. More than an allowable level of NH3 (NH4+) was formed during the catalytic reduction of NO3- in the groundwater, but was completely removed by the cation-exchange process using Na-mordenite. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据