4.3 Article

The mechanical properties of the human patellar tendon are correlated to its mass density and are independent of sex

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 645-652

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.02.008

关键词

patellar tendon; mass density; graft quality; sex; mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A diverse range of values for the mechanical properties of the human patellar tendon has been reported in the literature. Donor age has been excluded as a factor that causes this disparity. However, the effects of donor sex and tissue mass density on the mechanical properties of the patellar tendon have not been established. More importantly, predictors of the mechanical properties of the patellar tendon, used as grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries, are not available. Methods. Uniaxial tension tests were performed to determine the effects of donor sex and mass density of the tissue on the mechanical properties of twenty unpaired human patellar tendons (10 male and 10 female; age, 17-50). Mass density of the patellar tendon was determined by measuring its Volume and mass. Findings. No evidence of sex-based differences in any of the mechanical properties of the patellar tendon was found. The results revealed a diverse range of mass densities extending from a low of 0.76 g/cm(3) to a high of 2.68 g/cm(3) (250% difference). Furthermore, it was determined that the ultimate tensile strength (mean = 58.71 MPa), elastic modulus (mean = 507.38 MPa) and strain energy density (mean = 4.59 MPa) of the patellar tendon were significantly correlated to its mass density. The tensile strength and elastic modulus were significantly higher for those patellar tendons having a mass density greater than 1.67 g/cm(3). Interpretation. The mass density of the patellar tendon may be considered as an indicator of mechanical properties of the patellar tendon or graft quality. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据