4.1 Article

Epitope mapping using mRNA display and a unidirectional nested deletion library

期刊

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 309-319

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzi038

关键词

anti-polyhistidine; epitope mapping; HIS-1; in vitro selection; mRNA display; nested deletion; peptide libraries

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R00 AG030493] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM 60416, R01 GM060416-03, R01 GM060416] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vitro selection targeting an anti-polyhistidine monoclonal antibody was performed using mRNA display with a random, unconstrained 27-mer peptide library. After six rounds of selection, epitope-like peptides were identified that contain two to five consecutive, internal histidines and are biased for arginine residues, without any other identifiable consensus. The epitope was further refined by constructing a high-complexity, unidirectional fragment library from the final selection pool. Selection by mRNA display minimized the dominant peptide from the original selection to a 15-residue functional sequence (peptide Cmin: RHDAGDHHHHHGVRQ; K-D = 38 nM). Other peptides recovered from the fragment library selection revealed a separate consensus motif (ARRXA) C-terminal to the histidine track. Kinetics measurements made by surface plasmon resonance, using purified Fab (antigen-binding fragment) to prevent avidity effects, demonstrate that the selected peptides bind with 10- to 75-fold higher affinities than a hexahistidine peptide. The highest affinity peptides (K-D approximate to 10 nM) encode both a short histidine track and the ARRXA motif, suggesting that the motif and other flanking residues make important contacts adjacent to the core polyhistidine-binding site and can contribute > 2.5 kcal/mol of binding free energy. The fragment library construction methodology described here is applicable to the development of high-complexity protein or cDNA expression libraries for the identification of protein-protein interaction domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据