4.3 Article

Axonal transport of rubidium and thallium in the olfactory nerve of mice

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 505-512

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.03.009

关键词

axonal transport; olfactory nerve; ion delivery; autoradiographic imaging; Rb; Tl+

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following intranasal administration of radioactive Rb-86(+) and Tl-201(+) in mice, we observed this direct transport via the olfactory nerve pathway. The (RbCl)-Rb-86 and (TICl)-T-201 solutions were administered to two groups of mice, the unilateral intranasal and intravenous administration groups. After sacrifice, their heads were divided into the right and left side, which were then subdivided into seven parts; the nasal mucosa and brain regions were separated. Following the unilateral intranasal administration, uptake after 6 It by the olfactory bulb was significantly higher on the ipsilateral side (Rb-86, 0.7 %dose; Tl-201, 0.5 %dose) than on the contralateral side (Rb-86, 0.08 %dose; Tl-201, 0.15 %dose). Moreover, the Rb-86 and Tl-201 that accumulated in the olfactory bulb were gradually transported to other brain regions of the olfactory tract, the telencephalon and the diencephalon on the side corresponding to the nostril used for administration. Significant differences were observed between the right and left side of the brain regions 6 and 12 h after administration. Further, Tl-201 autoradiography clearly showed striped patterns of dense accumulation, localized in the region around the glomerular layer and granule cell layer of the olfactory bulb and around the olfactory cortex. These results provide clear evidence of axonal transport via the olfactory nerve pathway, from nasal cavity to the olfactory bulb, as well as to the olfactory cortex through the synaptic junctions. The olfactory transport of the Rb-86(+) and Tl-201(+) is thought to represent the behavior of K+ in the olfactory system. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据